I'm going to begin a critique of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH). This is not the first nor will it be the last that have been presented. Most of these critiques accept the basic paradigm an attempt to empirically prove that one can "beat the market".
For the practitioner, this can be quite appealing as it allows one to find some strategy that would allow one to earn "excess returns".
My approach, which I've been toying with in my mind for the last year or so, is going to be a bit different. My contention is that the entire paradigm is questionable and perhaps "meaningless"
1. At the very least, proponents of EMH have a a lot more work to do as there is a lot of ideological baggage and not much in the way of a legitimate scientific hypothesis.